Diaz v. Century Pacific Inv. Corp.

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert DIAZ, M.D.; Gerald Phaneuf; William Salsburg; George Herman, Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants/Appellants, v. CENTURY PACIFIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION; Irwin Jay Deutch; Price Waterhouse, Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellees. No. 92-56409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1994. Decided April 22, 1994. Before: Chief Judge WALLACE, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiffs Robert Diaz et al. appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Price Waterhouse on plaintiffs' securities fraud claims under Sec. 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78j(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Jones v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). I. Price Waterhouse's Statements 3 Each of PW's opinion letters…