Crespo v. I.N.S.

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mario Batacan CRESPO; Maria Einez P. Crespo; Claire Marie Crespo; Virgilio Amadeo Crespo; Menachem John Crespo; Joselito P. Crespo; Marcel Louis Pansacola Crespo, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70710. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1994. Decided April 5, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Mario Batacan Crespo seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge's (IJ) decision denying asylum, withholding of deportation, and voluntary departure. Crespo also seeks review of the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen the deportation proceedings. 4 Crespo contends that the BIA erred in denying his motion to set aside his attorney's concession of deportability and to reopen the deportation hearing, and to remand…