Debbs v. California Workers Compensation Appeals Bd.

Good Law
21 F.3d 1112·1994 WL 108910·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20088
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 199493-16442California510 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John L. DEBBS; Patsy R. Debbs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD; William B. Donohoe; Dennis Hannigan; Richard W. Younkin; Jacob Margosian; John S. Oda; John R. Sullivan; Diana Marshall; Department of Industrial Relations for the State of California, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 24, 1994. * Decided March 29, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John L. and Patsy R. Debbs appeal pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of their action against the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) and the State Department of Industrial Relations challenging the constitutionality of Cal.Lab.Code Secs. 5307, 5408, and alleging violations of their civil rights stemming from the adjudication…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.