David Crawford v. Gerald Goldberg Robert Bonnici John Akin James Stevens

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald GOLDBERG; Robert Bonnici; John Akin; James Stevens, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55889. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 13, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Crawford, appeals pro se the district court's order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Additionally, Crawford contends that the district court erred in denying him leave to file an amended complaint and that the district court erred in dismissing rather than staying an earlier civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. Dismissal of Prior Civil Rights Action 3 We are required to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction sua sponte. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.1992). A notice of appeal must be filed…