Larry D. Hines v. Robert G. Borg, Warden

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry D. HINES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55172. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1993. * Withdrawn from Submission Nov. 19, 1993. Resubmitted March 7, 1994. Decided March 11, 1994. Before: FARRIS, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 This case is resubmitted as of March 7, 1994. 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 California state prisoner Larry D. Hines appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his jury conviction for first degree murder. We affirm. I. INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL 4 Hines contends that his trial counsel was ineffective. To succeed, Hines must demonstrate that his attorney's performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). A. Testimony of Pamela Pitts 5 Hines alleges that his…