Jeana Hurst v. Prudential Securities Incorporated, Dba Prudential-Bache Capital Funding James Crowley

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jeana HURST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INCORPORATED, dba Prudential-Bache Capital Funding; James Crowley, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-15148. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1993. Decided April 4, 1994. Before: LAY, ** THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Prudential Securities, Inc. ("Prudential Securities") and James Crowley ("Crowley") appeal from a judgment of the district court denying their petition to compel arbitration in an action brought by Jeana Hurst ("Hurst") alleging violations of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, and RICO, and asserting state discrimination and contract claims. The district court found that Prudential Securities and Crowley had waived their right to compel arbitration, and additionally, that Title VII cases are not necessarily subject to arbitration. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand…