Darrel King v. Robert Borg

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrel KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15523. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1994. * Decided March 10, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and HILL, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Darrel King was convicted in state court of first degree murder, possession of a firearm, and possession of a firearm by a felon. Cal.Penal Code Secs. 187, 12022.5, 12021. He subsequently filed for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court. His petition was denied. In his appeal, King alleges that unconstitutional errors at his trial compel vacation of his conviction. 4 We review the district court's decision to deny King's petition for habeas corpus de novo. See Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc). We affirm because we find no merit in any of King's contentions. 5 I. King's rights under the Confrontation…