Janette Kent v. Milton Brown John Berman Norman Lindstedt David Buono Martha Hicks Lee Johnson Joseph Ceniceros James Ellis Donald Londer Joan O'Neill

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Janette KENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Milton BROWN; John Berman; Norman Lindstedt; David Buono; Martha Hicks; Lee Johnson; Joseph Ceniceros; James Ellis; Donald Londer; Joan O'Neill, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35256. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1994. * Decided March 30, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Janette Kent appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her civil rights action alleging deprivation of property without due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 The dispute underlying this action arises from the probate in Oregon state court of the estate of Donald Kettleberg. Kettleberg died intestate in 1985, and Kent subsequently established that she was the sole beneficiary of his multi-million dollar estate. In 1992, dissatisfied with the state courts' decisions…