Leo Goldberg v. Nvr Mortgage Does 1 Through 10

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leo GOLDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NVR MORTGAGE; Does 1 Through 10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56624. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leo Goldberg appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his action alleging fraud, breach of contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing against NVR Mortgage and others. The district court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Goldberg's action. We have jurisdiction to review the district court's decision under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , 1 and we affirm. 3 The existence of subject matter jurisdiction is reviewed de novo. Reebok Int'l, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enters., Inc., 970 F.2d 552 , 554 (9th Cir.1992). The district court's factual findings on jurisdictional issues are reviewed…