Michael Henry Ferdik v. James Gaspar Jeff Hood

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael Henry FERDIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GASPAR; Jeff Hood, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16813. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Michael Henry Ferdik appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials in Ferdik's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. 3 We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. Jones v. Union P. R.R. Co., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the substantive law. Id.; Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). 4 "[T]he treatment a prisoner…