James A. Hansen v. State of Oregon City of Eugene, a Municipal Corporation John C. Wood

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James A. HANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON; City of Eugene, a municipal corporation; John C. Wood, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36557. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1994. Decided March 25, 1994. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * A. DENIAL OF MOTION TO COMPEL DISCLOSURE 2 The district court did not err in denying Hansen's motion to compel disclosure of the informant's identity. The plaintiff seeking disclosure under these circumstances must 1) make specific allegations that indicate the portions of the [affidavit] he claims are false, " U.S. v. Jaramillo-Suarez, 950 F.2d 1378, 1387 (9th Cir.1991), 2) contend the "alleged falsehoods were made deliberately or with reckless disregard for the truth," Id., 3) accompany the allegations with an "offer of proof" challenging "the veracity of the search warrant officer…