Mid-Wilshire Property v. Dr. Leevil CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 2022G059899California933 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/20/22 Mid-Wilshire Property v. Dr. Leevil CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MID-WILSHIRE PROPERTY, L.P., et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. G059899

DR. LEEVIL, LLC, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2015-00801555)

Defendant and Respondent. OPINION

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Ronald L. Bauer, Judge. Reversed and remanded. Enenstein Pham & Glass and Teri Thuy Pham for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Law Offices of Ronald Richards and Associates and Ronald Richards; Law Office of Geoffrey Long and Geoffrey S. Long for Defendant and Respondent.

* * * *

THE COURT:

This dispute arises…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.