Don A. Herman v. Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board, State of Washington

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Don A. HERMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. INDETERMINATE SENTENCING REVIEW BOARD, STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35560. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1994. * Decided April 19, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, TANG, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner, Don A. Herman, appearing pro se, appeals the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 and, thus, the court's adoption of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner attacks both his 1972 state conviction for manslaughter and the decisions of the Washington Indeterminate Sentence Review Board ("Review Board") concerning his subsequent parole. We affirm. DISCUSSION 3 Petitioner charges that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to order production of the trial court's file; abused its discretion by failing to appoint…