Frederico Monico Figueroa v. Steven F. Pontesso

21 F.3d 1113 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederico Monico FIGUEROA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven F. PONTESSO, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-16636. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 22, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederico M. Figueroa, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas petition alleging that he was deprived of his liberty interest in a disciplinary action without due process of law after respondents found him guilty of using cocaine. Specifically, Figueroa claims that respondents: (a) denied him the opportunity to review a urinalysis laboratory report and the master urine surveillance log prior to his disciplinary hearing; and (b) failed to electronically record his disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Vargas v. United…