Kroll Associates, Delaware Corporation v. City and County of Honolulu Russel W. Miyake Frank F. Fasi, and Kevin P.H. Sumida Matsui, Chung & Sumida

Good Law
21 F.3d 1114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 199593-16804California2,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1114 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. KROLL ASSOCIATES, Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Russel W. Miyake; Frank F. Fasi, Defendants-Appellants, and Kevin P.H. Sumida; Matsui, Chung & Sumida, Appellants. No. 93-16804. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 25, 1994. Memorandum Withdrawn and Appeal Dismissed Feb. 27, 1995. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The City and County of Honolulu, Russell Miyake, Frank Fasi, and their lawyers appeal the district court's order of sanctions against attorney Kevin P.H. Sumida for repeated violations of the Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. The district court ordered Sumida to perform 100 hours of law-related community service. An order of sanctions is an appealable interlocutory order. Liew v. Breen, 640 F.2d 1046 (9th Cir.1981). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.