Frank J. Matylinsky v. George Sumner

21 F.3d 1114 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank J. MATYLINSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George SUMNER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17278. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 24, 1994. * Decided March 28, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Matylinsky, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. The district court determined that Matylinsky's constitutional rights were not violated when he was placed in administrative segregation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 Matylinsky was placed in administrative segregation on April 1, 1989, following a prison stabbing. Matylinsky was implicated in the incident by a confidential informant. On April 4,…