Lameire

Lameire v. F/V Resolute

Good Law
21 F.3d 1114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 19941114California578 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1114 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry LAMEIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F/V RESOLUTE, Official No. 553631, its Tackle, Equipment and Gear in Rem; Pacific King Fisheries, Inc., a Washington corporation, its owner, in Personam, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36852. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1994. Decided April 22, 1994. Before: HUG, HALL and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Pacific King Fisheries, Inc. (Pacific King) owns and operates the vessel F/V Resolute (the Resolute). Larry Lameire, a crewmember of the Resolute, was attacked by Michael Nyugen on the deck of the ship. Lameire appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Resolute and Pacific King. Lameire contends there are genuine issues of material fact regarding his Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW 3 We review a grant of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.