Milton Lewis Sr. v. Redding Medical Center

Good Law
21 F.3d 1114·1994 WL 123862·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20043
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 199493-15137California852 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1114 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Milton LEWIS Sr. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REDDING MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15137. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 11, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Milton Lewis Sr. appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for Redding Medical Center (RMC) in his action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. (Title VII). Lewis contends that the district court erred by finding that he was not subjected to a hostile work environment based upon race. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.