Panhandle Irrigation, Inc. v. Armando Coronado, and Maria Coronado

21 F.3d 1115 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PANHANDLE IRRIGATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando CORONADO, and Maria Coronado, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-16993. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 17, 1994. * Decided March 28, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, BOOCHEVER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Armando and Maria Coronado (collectively "the Coronados") seek reversal of the district court's judgment in favor of Panhandle Irrigation, Inc. ("Panhandle"). The Coronados contend that the district court erroneously declined to decide whether it had subject matter jurisdiction over the Panhandle action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * In their brief, the Coronados characterize this appeal as a challenge to the district court's refusal to consider, or to reconsider, whether it had subject matter jurisdiction over the Panhandle action. Because they admit that the district court…