Edward Dennis Rembert v. Charles P. Littlehales Patrick Flaherty Vincent Deguc Dennis Wine Merle Wine

21 F.3d 1115 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward Dennis REMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles P. LITTLEHALES; Patrick Flaherty; Vincent Deguc; Dennis Wine; Merle Wine; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35706. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Edward Dennis Rembert appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985, 1986, and 1988 against Oregon state judge Charles P. Littlehales, district attorney Patrick J. Flaherty, notary publics Merle I. Wine ("Wine") and Amy L. Chisman ("Chisman"), his son-in-law Jack W. Crider ("Crider"), and others. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 This court reviews for abuse of discretion a district court's sua sponte dismissal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct.…