Frances S. Norris v. Oklahoma City University Oklahoma City University School of Law

21 F.3d 1115 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frances S. NORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY; Oklahoma City University School of Law, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16647. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frances S. Norris, a 1992 graduate of Oklahoma City University School of Law, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction of her action against the university and its law school alleging violations of Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act of 1972, 20 U.S.C. Secs. 1681-88 ("Title IX"), and supplemental state-law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 This court reviews de novo a district court's determination concerning the existence of personal jurisdiction where the underlying jurisdictional facts are undisputed. Bourassa v.…