Narvis G. Nonnette v. Robert Borg, Warden John Vandekamp

21 F.3d 1115 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Narvis G. NONNETTE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Warden; John Vandekamp, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55451. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Narvis G. Nonnette ("Nonnette") appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his jury conviction for four counts of residential robbery. Nonnette argues that the state trial court violated his federal Constitutional rights by denying his motion for a new trial in his absence and by criticizing his advisory counsel. 3 The state trial court held that Nonnette's motion failed to state grounds sufficient to justify granting the motion. In Nonnette's previous appeal to our court, we affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part with…