Victor Reyes v. Pacific Bell

21 F.3d 1115 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor REYES, Appellant, v. PACIFIC BELL, et al., Appellee. No. 92-17007. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 18, 1994. Decided March 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, POOLE and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Following his discharge from a job as a night messenger for Pacific Bell, Victor Reyes brought this action in federal district court alleging wrongful discharge under the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 , and national origin discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal.Govt. Sec. 12940 et seq. He appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on these claims and its denial of his motion to amend his complaint to add a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12112 . We affirm. DISCUSSION I. The FEHA claim 3 The parties do not dispute that federal…