Louie Eddie Perez v. Bob Goldsmith

21 F.3d 1115 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louie Eddie PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bob GOLDSMITH, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-16598. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 22, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louie Eddie Perez, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for six counts of sexual assault. Perez contends that his due process rights were violated when the trial court: (a) made prejudicial remarks to a witness testifying against him; and (b) erred in not granting a mistrial after two jurors saw the same witness vomiting during one of her breaks outside the courtroom and sobbing after her testimony. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 668 (9th Cir.1993) and affirm. 3 A…