United States v. John Berry

Good Law
21 F.3d 1116·1994 WL 143941·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20001
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 199492-16647California1,577 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1116 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John BERRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-16647. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 22, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Berry, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Berry was convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine with intent to distribute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and review de novo. United States v. Moore, 921 F.2d 207, 209 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm. 3 We note at the outset that it is very difficult to determine precisely what claims Berry is attempting to raise on appeal. However, based on our review of Berry's voluminous filings with the district court and with this Court, we discern the following issues: (1) his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.