Martin Trowery v. United States

Good Law
21 F.3d 1116·1994 WL 146060·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20003
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 199493-55774California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1116 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martin TROWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-55774. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 25, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin Trowery, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his sentence imposed following a jury trial. Trowery was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin and the unlawful use of a communication facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 & 843(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Trowery contends that he was tried in violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 . This contention lacks merit. 4 "The Speedy Trial Act is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.