United States v. Robert Ray Floyd

21 F.3d 1116 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Ray FLOYD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10481. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 17, 1994. * Decided March 21, 1994. Before: POOLE, CANBY AND RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Ray Floyd was prosecuted for his role as the chief of the ground crew in a drug ring that employed small aircraft to smuggle marijuana from Mexico into southern Arizona. A jury convicted Floyd of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 , and possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). In his pro se appeal, Floyd alleges that the district court committed numerous errors before and during trial. We affirm. ANALYSIS 3 Floyd's assertions of error begin even before the grand jury proceeding. He alleges that he was prejudiced by the government's delay…