United States v. Steven Maros, United States of America v. Paul J. Huntoon

21 F.3d 1117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven MAROS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul J. HUNTOON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50117, 93-50166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided April 4, 1994. Before: PREGERSON, O'SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Huntoon pled guilty to, and Steven Maros was convicted by a jury on, one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance on board a vessel in violation of 46 App.U.S.C. Sec. 1903(a). Both men appeal the district court's ruling not to suppress evidence seized during the Coast Guard's document and safety inspection. Maros also appeals his sentence. We affirm. 3 * The Coast Guard's search was reasonable and did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Applying the test from United States v. Watson, 678 F.2d 765 (9th Cir.1982), we…