United States v. Mario Antonio MacHado and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada

Good Law
21 F.3d 1117·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19893
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 199492-10569California1,927 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Antonio MACHADO-MARTINEZ and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-10569, 92-10604. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1993. Order Withdrawn March 22, 1994. Decided March 22, 1994. Before: REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. * ORDER The Memorandum previously filed on October 5, 1993 in this case is hereby WITHDRAWN. MEMORANDUM ** These matters came before the Court pursuant to appellants' timely appeal from the district court's denial of their joint motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. After oral argument, and upon due consideration, this Court found no error in the district court's determination that the contraband in question was properly seized under the Fourth Amendment. Upon reconsideration,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.