United States v. Renaldo King

21 F.3d 1117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Renaldo KING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 11, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Renaldo King appeals his conviction imposed following his conditional guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). King contends the district court erred by denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to challenge the veracity of statements in the affidavit supporting the search warrant pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 1 3 * Background 4 Inglewood Police Officer Michael Harkins applied for a warrant to search Renaldo King's apartment and included the following information in his affidavit in support of the warrant.…