United States v. Charles Lane, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
21 F.3d 1117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles LANE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, TANG and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Lane shot, killed and illegally sold the body parts of protected Alaskan wildlife. For violating the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 3372 (a), and also for distributing marijuana, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a), he received 12 months imprisonment and 4 years of supervised release. He appeals a condition of his supervised release that prohibits him from possessing a firearm, even during subsistence hunts. 1 We affirm. 3 We review for an abuse of discretion the court's discretionary decision to impose an available condition. United States v. Johnson, 998 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir.1993). The district court had broad discretion in setting the conditions of…