United States v. Charles Lane, Jr.

Good Law
21 F.3d 1117·1994 WL 134588·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19911
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199492-30344California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles LANE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, TANG and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Lane shot, killed and illegally sold the body parts of protected Alaskan wildlife. For violating the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 3372 (a), and also for distributing marijuana, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a), he received 12 months imprisonment and 4 years of supervised release. He appeals a condition of his supervised release that prohibits him from possessing a firearm, even during subsistence hunts. 1 We affirm. 3 We review for an abuse of discretion the court's discretionary decision to impose an available condition. United States v. Johnson, 998 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir.1993). The district court had broad discretion in setting the conditions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.