United States v. Reyes Inzunza

21 F.3d 1117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reyes INZUNZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10293. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1994. * Decided March 28, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Reyes Inzunza appeals his convictions following jury trial for two counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Inzunza contends the district court abused its discretion by not severing the counts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 * Factual Background 4 On June 12, 1992, Inzunza entered the First Federal Credit Union pointed a gun at teller Meryl Hopper, ordered manager Ofelia Soto to hang up the telephone, and closed the front and storage doors. Inzunza ordered Hopper to fill his duffle bag with money from the counter. Inzunza ordered Soto to give him the money from the vault and Soto placed…