United States v. Raymond Armando Ortiz, Aka: Reynaldo Armando Ortiz

21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Armando ORTIZ, aka: Reynaldo Armando Ortiz, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50214. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1994. * Decided April 11, 1994. Before: HALL, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Reynaldo Armando Ortiz appeals his 170-month sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines following his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Ortiz argues that his three prior state felony convictions resulted from constitutionally invalid guilty pleas, and therefore the district court erred by classifying him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. Sec. 4B1.1. We affirm. I. 3 Defendant claims that his prior guilty pleas were not made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily because he was not fully advised of all of his constitutional rights, did not have the elements of the charges…