United States v. Ronald Everett Newble, Aka: Ronald Evertt Newble
Opinion
Opinion
21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Everett NEWBLE, aka: Ronald Evertt Newble, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50637. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 11, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Everett Newble appeals his 8-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to possession of document making implements in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1028 (a). Newble contends the district court erred by adjusting upward his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.1(c) based on a finding that he was a "manager or supervisor" in the offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and vacate and remand for resentencing. 3 We review for clear error the district court's determination that Newble was "an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor." See United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099,…