United States v. Efrain Oseguera-Haros

21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efrain OSEGUERA-HAROS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 11, 1994. Decided April 19, 1994. Before: HUG, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Efrain Oseguera-Haros appeals his conviction by a jury for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, distribution of cocaine, and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a narcotics offense. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a new trial and an evidentiary hearing based on newly discovered evidence, and that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The appellant further contends that the trial court issued erroneous jury instructions on the handgun offense and on the definition of reasonable doubt. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL and EVIDENTIARY…