United States v. Tom Reveille
Opinion
Opinion
21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tom REVEILLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-55433. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1993. Decided April 5, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Tom Reveille operated a low power radio station from his home in Venice, California. The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), after investigating and warning appellant, levied a penalty forfeiture against him. The government then brought two suits in district court, to enforce the forfeiture, and for declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent further transmissions. Reveille filed a counterclaim for return of his seized property, appearing pro se as he did in this court. The government moved for summary judgment on all claims. Reveille filed a "notice of objection to motion for summary judgment" the day of the hearing. The…