United States v. Hugo Mladosich-Navejar, AKA Hugo Navejar-Mladosich

21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugo MLADOSICH-NAVEJAR, aka Hugo Navejar-Mladosich, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50308. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1994. Decided April 25, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * I. FACTS 2 Mladosich was convicted of being found in the United States after having been deported. 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (a), (b)(1). We affirm. His first indictment was dismissed without prejudice, because he was not brought to trial within 70 days as required by the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3161 . The delay resulted from a successful interlocutory appeal. 3 The district court had ruled in accord with our decision in United States v. Proa-Tovar, 945 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir.1991) that evidence of Mladosich's prior deportations would be suppressed because he had not made a knowing and…