United States v. Robert T. Reynolds

21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert T. REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30194. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 9, 1994. * Decided April 19, 1994. Before: HUG, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an action by Robert Reynolds challenging his conviction for conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 and 1341. Reynolds asserts that he was denied a fair trial because of various errors at trial, including the district court's improper admission of incriminating evidence. Reynolds also asserts that the Government failed to produce sufficient evidence of his involvement in the conspiracy to sustain the conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. DISCUSSION I. The Jencks Act 3 Reynolds contends that the district court erred in admitting the testimony of FBI Special Agent Carl…