United States v. William Richard Sattes

21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Richard SATTES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50332. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 9, 1994. * Decided March 21, 1994. Before: PREGERSON, O'SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Sattes appeals the district court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence discovered during a January 24, 1992 search of his home. Specifically, Sattes challenges the court's determination that the affidavit supporting a warrant to search his residence for methamphetamine and certain chemicals and paraphernalia used in its production established probable cause for the search. We affirm. 3 Before a search warrant may issue, evidence must be submitted establishing probable cause that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in the place to be searched. United States v. Depew, 8 F.3d 1424, 1428 (9th Cir.1993).…