United States v. Robert Franklin Shilt

21 F.3d 1118 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Franklin SHILT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 11, 1994. * Decided April 25, 1994. 1 Before: SKOPIL, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Robert Shilt appeals his sentence entered on a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement. Shilt argues that his plea and his waiver of the right to appeal were not knowing and voluntary, his sentence violated the terms of the plea agreement, and he should not have been sentenced as a career offender. We affirm. 1. Knowing and Voluntary Plea 4 Shilt argues that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 by failing to inform him that his sentence might include restitution. When a district court advises a defendant that he could be required to pay a fine greater…