United States v. Thomas Howard Yeakley Aline Yeakley

21 F.3d 1119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Howard YEAKLEY; Aline Yeakley, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-30340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 25, 1994. * Decided March 30, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thomas H. Yeakley and Aline I. Yeakley ("the Yeakleys") appeal their convictions and 4-month sentences, following a jury trial, for knowingly and fraudulently concealing property and willfully aiding and abetting the concealment of property during a bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 152 , 2. The Yeakleys contend that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions and that the district court failed to state adequate reasons for sentencing them each to four months in prison. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Sufficiency of the Evidence 4 The Yeakleys contend…