United States v. Gerard J. Vanhoorelbeke

21 F.3d 1119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerard J. VANHOORELBEKE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. Decided April 11, 1994. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Gerard Vanhoorelbeke was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, distribution of cocaine, unlawful possession of a firearm, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Vanhoorelbeke appeals, arguing that his subpoena of police records was improperly quashed, that evidence was erroneously admitted and excluded, that he was denied his right to effective counsel, that insufficient evidence was presented at trial, and that the district court erred in increasing his offense level at sentencing. We affirm. 3 * The issuance of a subpoena duces tecum "requires a showing of relevancy, admissibility, and specificity." United States…