United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle, Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin, United States of America v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong

Good Law
21 F.3d 1431
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 199493-50031California10,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1431 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant, and Robert Rozelle, Aaron Hampton; Freddie Mack; Shelton Auntwan Martin, Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-50031, 93-50057. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided Jan. 21, 1994. Opinion Withdrawn April 20, 1994. Order April 20, 1994. Lawrence H. Cho and Miriam A. Krinski, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. David Dudley, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Armstrong. Timothy C. Lannen, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Hampton. Barbara O'Connor, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Martin. Joseph F. Walsh, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Rozelle. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., * REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. ORDER The opinion and dissent filed January 21, 1994, slip op. 599, and appearing at 14 F.3d 1387 (9th Cir.1994), are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.