In Re Tamen

Good Law
22 F.3d 199·94 Daily Journal DAR 5031·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7423·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2623
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 199492-56171California3,204 words

Opinion

Opinion

22 F.3d 199 In re E. Jerome TAMEN; Nelly Danielle Tamen, Debtors. E. Jerome TAMEN; Nelly Danielle Tamen, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALHAMBRA WORLD INVESTMENT, INC.; Daniel Chu; Delta Partnership Pacific, Ltd., Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-56171. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1994. Decided April 15, 1994. Arthur Leeds, McKenna & Fitting, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees. Aaron M. Peck, Rogers & Wells, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellants. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Before: SNEED, THOMPSON, and Pamela Ann RYMER, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge SNEED. OPINION SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 This case stems from agreements for the sale and subsequent development of real property. The seller claims that the buyer breached the agreements by reselling the property prior to development. The bankruptcy court found the buyer, and several related defendants, liable under various contract and tort theories. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirmed. We also affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 2 Plaintiff E. Jerome Tamen was the general partner in two California limited partnerships, University…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.