United States v. David Paul Colussi

Good Law
22 F.3d 218·94 Daily Journal DAR 5097·1994 WL 131253·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7619·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2652
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 199493-50140California1,569 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

David Paul Colussi appeals his 210-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Colussi contends the district court erred in denying Colussi’s request for a one level reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b) because the court mistakenly concluded that the matter was discretionary, failed to make any findings of fact, and mistakenly concluded that defendant had stipulated to a two point reduction for acceptance of responsibility only. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate and remand for further proceedings to determine whether Colussi is eligible for an additional reduction of one level for timely plea of guilty pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E 1.1(b)(2).

I.

On March 6, 1992, David Paul Colussi robbed a bank in Long Beach, California using his fingers to pretend he had a gun and telling the teller: “This is a robbery, give me the money. I have a gun, put it in the bag.” Four days later, Colussi was apprehended by Long Beach police officers. His response was “You got me. I did it.” An indictment was issued on May 12, 1992. On August 3, 1992, Colussi was arraigned, he pled not guilty, and trial was set for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.