Edwin L. Bricker v. Rockwell International Corporation

Good Law
22 F.3d 871
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 199491-36153California5,049 words

Opinion

Opinion

22 F.3d 871 10 IER Cases 51 Edwin L. BRICKER; Cynthia Bricker, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; Rockwell Hanford Corporation; Westinghouse Corporation; Westinghouse Hanford Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36153. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided Oct. 25, 1993. Amended April 15, 1994. Thad Guyer, T.M. Guyer & Friends, P.C., Medford, OR, Michael E. Withey, Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, Seattle, WA, for plaintiffs-appellants. David F. Jurca and Mark F. Rising, Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellee Rockwell Intern. Corp. William R. Squires III, Stuart R. Dunwoody, and Bergitta K. Trelstad, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle, WA, and Robert A. Dutton, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA, for defendant-appellee Westinghouse Hanford Co. ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Before: CANBY, WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 Opinion by Judge CANBY. ORDER 2 The opinion filed October 25, 1993 is amended by inserting the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.