Heckman

Heckman v. Sutter

Good Law
1 Alaska Fed. 880·119 F. 83·55 C.C.A. 635·1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 1902No. 792California2,875 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ross, J.

The record in this case shows that for many years there was a small Indian settlement at a point on Tongass narrows, in Southeastern Alaska, where Ketchikan creek flows into the sea. The shore line there is in the form of a crescent, in front of which, at low tide, there is a sand and gravel beach alternately covered and uncovered by the flow and ebb of the tide. It was the custom of the Indians to fish for salmon at that place, as they were and still are found in great numbers at and about the point where the creek empties into the sea.

On the 17th day of May, 1884, congress passed an act entitled “An act providing a civil government for Alaska” ( 23 Stat. 26 ), by which the land district of Alaska was created, and a United States land office established at Sitka. No provision was thereby made for the entry nor for the survey of any of the public lands of the territory other than mining claims, but it was, among other things, provided by section 8 of the act ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 356 and note) *882 “that the Indians or other persons in said district shall not be disturbed in the possession of any lands actually in their use or occupation or now claimed by them, but the terms under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.