Insley

Insley v. Garside

Good Law
121 F. 699·2 Alaska Fed. 67·58 C.C.A. 119·1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4658
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 1903No. 829California1,836 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ross, J.

This is an appeal by -the trustee of the estate of one I. J. Sharick, a bankrupt, from a judgment allowing a claim against the bankrupt estate in favor of the appellees, George W. Garside and William Winn, and decreeing its priority over all other claims against the estate. The claim of Garside and Winn arises out of these facts: Sharick, who was carrying on the jewelry business at Juneau, Alaska, in the name of the Alaska Jewelry Company, obtained in the court below a decree of divorce against his wife, Caroline Sharick. Thereafter Mrs. Sharick filed therein a petition praying that the decree be modified or annulled, and that she be awarded and decreed to have alimony of and from said I. J. Sharick. Mrs. Sharick also commenced an action in the same court against I. J. Sharick and the Alaska Jewelry Company for a division of the stock of jewelry, which she alleged to be community property of herself and I. J. Sharick. In the latter action,- the court *69 having appointed a receiver of the jewelry, it was ordered by the court that: “Upon the defendants, I. J. Sharick and the Alaska Jewelry Company, executing a good and sufficient bond herein in the sum of $2,000, conditioned that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.