Lange

Lange v. Robinson

Good Law
148 F. 799·2 Alaska Fed. 650·79 C.C.A. 1·1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4371
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 1906No. 1,295California2,699 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haven, J.

This action was commenced in the District Court for the District of Alaska, Third Division, for the purpose of determining that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of certain mineral lands, to which the defendants assert an adverse claim. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by the plaintiff the defendants moved for a dismissal of the action upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to show that he had any legal or equitable estate in the land described in the complaint, and for the further reason that it was not shown that he was in possession of such land at the date of the commencement of the action. The motion was granted upon the ground first stated, and it was thereupon adjudged that the action be “dismissed without prejudice against the plaintiff of any kind whatsoever,” the defendants to • recover costs. From this judgment the plaintiff has appealed.

*652 The lands in controversy embrace 10 separate placer mining claims, containing 20 acres each. One of these claims was located by H. W. Benson, grantor of plaintiff, one by the plaintiff, for himself, and the remaining eight by the plaintiff acting as agent for others, who have since conveyed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.