Hornstein

Hornstein v. United States

Good Law
155 F. 48·2 Alaska Fed. 777·83 C.C.A. 64·1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 1907No. 1,403California1,096 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

Charles Hornstein, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the crime of gambling after trial upon information filed in the United States Commissioner’s Court for the District of Alaska. To the information Hornstein filed a demurrer and plea in abatement, raising the point that the United States Commissioner had no jurisdiction over an offense committed within the incorporated limits of the town of Nome, District of Alaska, where the alleged crime was *778 committed. The plea in abatement and demurrer were overruled, trial was then had before a jury, and a verdict of guilty was rendered. The plaintiff in error moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, and thereupon he was fined. From the judgment of conviction he sued out a writ of error to this court.

The statute of Alaska under which the information was filed reads as follows: “That each and every person who shall deal, play, or carry on, open or cause to be opened, or who shall conduct, either as owner, proprietor or employee whether for hire or not, any game of faro, monte, roulette, rouge et noir, lansquenet, rondo, vingt-un, twenty-one, poker, draw poker, bragg, bluff, thaw, craps, or any banking or other device whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.